EPSTEIN
page 1 / 3023 . OCR, unverified
Dataset9 002
--- SOURCE: VOL00009__IMAGES__0002__EFTA00067375.txt ---
METADATA_SOURCE: VOL00009IMAGES0002
METADATA_FILENAME: EFTA00067375.pdf
----------------------------------------
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject: Revised Notification to Victims regarding right to see Epstein agreement.
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:18:36 +0000
Importance: Normal
HAM-
In light of the complaint of Mr. Epstein's counsel regarding my earlier notification language, I have
revised it as follows:
"In addition, there has been litigation between the United States and two other victims regarding the disclosure
of the entire agreement between the United States and Mr. Epstein. Mr. Josefsberg can provide further guidance
on this issue or, if Ms.
has selected another attorney to represent her in the context of civil litigation, that
attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re Jane Does 1 and 2, S.D. Fl. Court File No. 08-80736-
CIV-MARRA, and advise her accordingly."
What do you think? This was my original language:
"In addition, a judge has ordered that the United States make available to any designated victim (and/or her
attorney) a copy of the actual agreement between Mr. Epstein and the United States, so long as the victim (and/or
her attorney) reviews, signs, and agrees to be bound by a Protective Order entered by the Court. If Ms.
would like to review the Agreement, please let me know, and I will forward a copy of the Protective Order for
her signature."
Thanks.
500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone
Fax 561 820-8777
EFTA00067375
--- SOURCE: VOL00009__IMAGES__0002__EFTA00067376.txt ---
METADATA_SOURCE: VOL00009IMAGES0002
METADATA_FILENAME: EFTA00067376.pdf
----------------------------------------
From: "
. (USAFIS)" </O=USA/OU=FLS/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN
To: "
(USAF'S)" <
>1
(USAFLS)"
>, '
(USAF'S)" <
=',
(USAFLS)" <
>
Cc: "
• (FBI)" <
>, "
(FBI)"
Subject: Draft e-mail to Roy Black re Epstein
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:09:34 +0000
Importance: Normal
Hi everyone:
I would like to send the following out to Roy and Jay later today:
Dear Roy and Jay:
I wanted to raise two issues with you regarding the Epstein case.
First, it has come to my attention that Mr. Epstein is again trying to obtain work release, contrary to the terms
and spirit of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. This also directly contradicts the conversation I had with Jack
Goldberger the weekend before Mr. Epstein's guilty plea, wherein Jack confirmed that Mr. Epstein would be in
custody and would aol seek work release during the 18-month term of incarceration. Please advise whether Mr.
Epstein is, indeed, requesting work release.
Second, Stuart Mermelstein of Herman & Mermelstein P.A. has filed an Ethics Complaint with the Florida Bar
asserting that the letters to the victims advising them of their rights under the terms of the Non-Prosecution
Agreement violate a series of Florida Bar Rules. In the context of my response to that Complaint, I anticipate
that the Ethics Counsel will need to review the entire Agreement. If you have any objection to that disclosure,
please let me know so that I may communicate that to the Ethics Counsel.
Please provide answers as promptly as possible.
Thank you for your assistance.
Assistant U.S. Attorne
one
Fax
EFTA00067376
--- SOURCE: VOL00009__IMAGES__0002__EFTA00067377.txt ---
METADATA_SOURCE: VOL00009IMAGES0002
METADATA_FILENAME: EFTA00067377.pdf
----------------------------------------
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Document 99
Entered on FLSD Docket 05:14:2009
Page 1 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
JANE DOE NO. 2,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
JANE DOE NO. 3,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
JANE DOE NO. 4,
Plaintiff,
vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON
JANE DOE NO. 5,
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
VS.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
EFTA00067377
--- PAGE 2 ---
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Document 99
Entered on FLSD Docket 05/14/2009
Page 2 of 4
Defendant.
JANE DOE NO. 6,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
CASE NO.: 08-80994-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
JANE DOE NO. 7,
CASE NO.: 08-80993-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
C.M.A.,
CASE NO.: 08-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
JANE DOE,
CASE NO.: 08- 80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
VS.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al,
EFTA00067378
--- PAGE 3 ---
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Document 99
Entered on FLSD Docket 0514.2009
Page 3 of 4
Defendants.
DOE II,
CASE NO.: 09- 80469-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al,
Defendants.
JANE DOE NO. 101,
CASE NO.: 09- 80591-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
JANE DOE NO. 102
CASE NO.: 09- 80656-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
ORDER REQUESTING THE UNITED STATES TO PROVIDE ITS POSITION